Archive for September, 2006
09.22.06
Posted in Statewide News at 3:28 pm by admin
The Lansing State Journal editorial board had a very strong op-ed piece in today’s paper taking gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos to task for his support of teaching “intelligent design” in public school science classrooms. In addition to making the correct point that intelligent design is not really a scientific theory at all but rather a set of religious beliefs masquerading as science, they also make an important point about DeVos’ inconsistency with regard to educational standards:
Second, by associating a controversial issue such as intelligent design with the issue of local control, DeVos is speaking against his own position in improving state educational standards.
Earlier this year the legislature passed HB 5606, which attempted to standardize the curriculum requirements across the board for all of Michigan’s public schools and charter schools. Dick Devos was a staunch supporter of that bill. Yet on the issue of intelligent design, he suddenly changes positions and wants to have different things taught in different school districts without any consistency.
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
Posted in Statewide News at 2:09 am by admin
For Immediate Release
September 22,2006
Dr. Robert T. Pennock
President, Michigan Citizens for Science
http://www.michigancitizensforscience.org
president@michigancitizensforscience.org
As the views of gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos on teaching “intelligent design” in public schools have come to the public’s attention in the last few days, the DeVos campaign seems to be engaging in doubletalk on the issue. A Michigan Citizens for Science member wrote to the campaign inquiring about those views. Bizarrely, the DeVos camp is claiming he was misrepresented by the Detroit Free Press when in fact they quoted a statement the campaign put out almost verbatim. Here’s the full text of their email response. We’ve marked certain key phrases in different ways for comparison purposes:
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
Posted in Statewide News at 1:16 am by admin
The Livingston Press and Argus newspaper has a report on gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos and his now-public position on teaching intelligent design along with evolution in public school science classrooms. Included in the article was a reaction from MCFS President Robert Pennock:
Robert T. Pennock, president of Michigan Citizens for Science, agreed.
“How could Michigan students compete in the life sciences, so important to our economy, if DeVos has them learn pseudoscience?” he asked. “A federal judge appointed by President Bush ruled just last year that intelligent design creationism is ’sectarian religion masquerading as science,’ so including it in the public schools is unconstitutional. DeVos is not only recommending that Michigan schools abandon real science, but that they break the law as well.”
This is a very important point that the public needs to understand. By encouraging local school districts to incorporate intelligent design into their science curriculum, DeVos is inviting them into a Dover Trap. In that Federal court case last year, the Dover Area School District ended up with a legal bill in excess of $1 million dollars after going ahead with an ID policy against the advice of their own attorney. Every relevant court precedent is strongly against DeVos’ position and it is irresponsible for the state government to encourage local school districts to do what the Federal courts have already declared unconstitutional and risk their financial well being in the process.
Permalink
09.20.06
Posted in Statewide News at 5:50 pm by admin
Dick DeVos, the Republican candidate for governor in Michigan, has confirmed what we already knew from the report of one of our MCFS members in a letter to the editor last week, that he advocates teaching ID in public school science classrooms. The Detroit Free Press reports:
“I would like to see the ideas of intelligent design that many scientists are now suggesting is a very viable alternative theory,” DeVos told the Associated Press this week during an interview on education. “That theory and others that would be considered credible would expose our students to more ideas, not less.”…
DeVos told the AP this week that allowing school districts to include intelligent design in science classes lets them to “expose students to a multitude of ideas, … to think through the challenges, to learn to discern between multiple theories.”
Up until now, of course, ID advocates have not developed an ID theory, their rhetoric to the contrary notwithstanding, nor have they published any research supporting intelligent design. And as the Free Press notes, a Federal judge in Pennsylvania last year ruled that ID is merely a religious viewpoint wrapped in a thin veneer of scientific-sounding language and that it is therefore unconstitutional to teach it in public school science classes. DeVos’ policy, like the various legislative attempts to open the door to the teaching of ID in science classes, would lead local school districts into a Dover Trap, inviting them to violate the constitution and risk losing expensive lawsuits.
Permalink
09.15.06
Posted in Statewide News at 11:14 am by admin
On Tuesday, the Michigan Board of Education decided to postpone its vote on new science standards at the request of two conservative members of the state legislature. The postponement was to allow more time for the legislature to have “input” into the new science standards, which in reality means more time to weaken them and water them down in regard to the teaching of evolution. The Detroit Free Press had a prescient editorial on the matter in Thursday’s paper. They wrote:
This is just another attempt to keep a door open to teaching creationism or intelligent design. The board should have closed it, as science teachers requested. Board members get elected to make decisions, not to defer to political pressure.
The delay was requested by the chairs of the House and Senate Education Committees to accommodate Republican state Reps. Jack Hoogendyk of Kalamazoo and John Moolenaar of Midland, who want a key wording change inserted into the policy. As it stands, the policy directs that teachers demonstrate how fossil records, comparative anatomy and other evidence “may” corroborate the theory of evolution. Hoogendyk and Moolenaar are pushing to have the words read “may or may not.”
Sounds innocuous, but this is really about injecting faith and beliefs into science.
Michigan’s new curriculum is supposed to set tough guidelines, not try to spoon-feed an ideology to students. Teachers who are allowed to, will, no doubt instruct students in the value of thinking about science broadly and asking critical questions.
By deferring even this much to the legislators, the state board has essentially given science teachers a vote of no confidence and deprived them of a chance to collaborate on classroom strategies. That’s because the board won’t vote until Oct. 10, and the science curriculum guidelines were supposed to be in place by an Oct. 3 statewide conference for teachers on Earth science, biology, chemistry and physics.
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
09.14.06
Posted in Statewide News at 10:21 pm by admin
Dr. Eric Fauman, a biochemist who works for Pfizer, reported to us last week on a question he got to ask Republican Gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos last week. That report has now been published as a letter to the Ann Arbor News. It is reprinted below with his permission:
As an interested Michigan voter I attended a campaign stop by Republican candidate for governor, Dick DeVos, at the Pfizer research center in Ann Arbor on Sept. 8. As a researcher with a PhD in biochemistry whose livelihood depends on exploring the biological and evolutionary underpinnings of disease, I was pleased with DeVos’s stated support for public education, the Life Sciences Corridor and Michigan’s global presence.
However, I was greatly disheartened by DeVos’s response when I asked him about his “position on the teaching of evolution in our public schools.” Although he espoused support for teaching the theory of evolution, DeVos volunteered his conviction that our children should also be taught other theories, “such as Intelligent Design.” As Judge Jones found in last years Kitzmiller v. Dover, “An objective observer would know that Intelligent Design [is a] Creationist, religious strateg[y] that evolved from earlier forms of Creationism.” One of Intelligent Design’s most prominent advocates, William Dembski, has stated that “Intelligent Design is just the Logos theology of Johns Gospel restated in the idiom of information theory.” At a time when our students’ science literacy is already significantly below average teaching our children sectarian religious beliefs as science can only harm our state’s ability to compete internationally.
Eric B. Fauman, Ann Arbor
Permalink